Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 11 (1):52-62 (2017)

Abstract
Since the end of the Second World War, the popularity of modern elite sport has grown immensely and so has the economical interests in sport. Athletes have become attractive advertising partners. Much money is at stake so it is understandable that companies are alarmed when their poster boys or girls are caught up in scandals. Inspired by a recent study, which found that stock return of primary team sponsors in cycling was not affected if the team was involved in doping scandals, this paper is an attempt to explain why athletes often maintain their marketing value even if they are exposed as bad role models. The thesis is that the attraction of athletes relates to the concept of ‘charisma’, and that the success of mass spectator sports is due to sport’s appeal to what psychologist Henry Rutgers Marshall by the end of the 19th Century in an article in Mind identified as man’s ‘religious instinct’. So after a brief introduction, the paper begins with a clarification of the antiquated concept ‘religious instinct’. This is followed by a critical examination of the secular usage of ‘charisma’ as introduced by Max Weber. Peter Sloterdijk’s sobering point that Hitler’s aptitude for his role in Germany did not rely on charisma lays the foundation for a more precise and rationally consistent description of the concept. It is argued that charisma is not something certain individuals posses, rather it is something that is experienced as an emotional effect by those who label individuals charismatic, which is based on the honesty competence and commitment of the perceived ‘charismatic’ person. Idols can have charismatic effect on us even if they are unprincipled cheats so long as they are committed to what they do. This is why athletes maintain their appeal and marketing value so long as their performances transcend the capabilities of ordinary people.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17511321.2017.1292307
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Elite Sport: Reification, Instrumentalization and Dignity.Philippe Sarremejane - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (3):324-340.
Doping is a Threat to Sporting Excellence.John William Devine - 2011 - British Journal of Sports Medicine 45 (8):637-639.
Sport and the Àrtistic.S. K. Wertz - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (233):392 - 393.
Respecting Privacy in Detecting Illegitimate Enhancements in Athletes.Sarah Teetzel - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):159 – 170.
Sport as a Moral Practice: An Aristotelian Approach: Michael W. Austin.Michael W. Austin - 2013 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 73:29-43.
Doping Is Bad In Sport Because Doping Is Bad For Sport.John William Devine - 2013 - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 43:41-43.
Drugs, Sport, Anxiety and Foucauldian Governmentality.Michael Burke & Christopher Hallinan - 2008 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (1):39 – 55.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-16

Total views
13 ( #744,137 of 2,448,711 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,641 of 2,448,711 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes