Resilience beyond reductionism: ethical and social dimensions of an emerging concept in the neurosciences

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (1):55-63 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since a number of years, popular and scientific interest in resilience is rapidly increasing. More recently, also neuroscientific research in resilience and the associated neurobiological findings is gaining more attention. Some of these neuroscientific findings might open up new measures to foster personal resilience, ranging from magnetic stimulation to pharmaceutical interventions and awareness-based techniques. Therefore, bioethics should also take a closer look at resilience and resilience research, which are today philosophically under-theorized. In this paper, we analyze different conceptualizations of resilience and argue that especially one-sided understandings of resilience which dismiss social and cultural contexts of personal resilience do pose social and ethical problems. On a social level such unbalanced views on resilience could hide and thereby stabilize structural social injustices, and on an individual level it might even lead to an aggravation of stress-related mental health problems by overexerting the individual. Furthermore, some forms of fostering resilience could be a latent form of human enhancement and trigger similar criticisms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,549

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Community Resilience and Social Memory.Geoff A. Wilson - 2015 - Environmental Values 24 (2):227-257.
Is resilience a normative concept?Henrik Thorén & Lennart Olsson - 2018 - Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 2 (6):112-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-12

Downloads
28 (#568,659)

6 months
12 (#312,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.
The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.

View all 18 references / Add more references