Pedophilia and Computer-Generated Child Pornography

In David Boonin, Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 369-381 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, we ask three questions about pedophilia: Is it immoral to be a pedophile? Is it immoral for pedophiles to seek out sexual contact with children? Is it immoral for pedophiles to satisfy their sexual preferences by using computer-generated graphics, sex dolls, and/or sex robots that mimic children? We argue that it is not immoral to be a pedophile, it is immoral for pedophiles to seek out sexual contact with children because of the expected harm to children, and it is morally permissible for pedophiles to satisfy their sexual preferences in ways that do not involve any real children.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,859

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral status of harmless adult-child sex.Stephen Kershnar - 2001 - Public Affairs Quarterly 15 (2):111--132.
Is Sex With Robots Rape?Romy Eskens - 2017 - Journal of Practical Ethics 5 (2):62-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
157 (#154,131)

6 months
20 (#153,859)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Aksel Sterri
Harvard University
Ole Martin Moen
University of Oslo

References found in this work

Pedophilia.Igor Primoratz - 1999 - Public Affairs Quarterly 13 (1):99-110.

Add more references