The (Stabilized) Nash Bargaining Solution as a Principle of Distributive Justice

Utilitas 22 (4):447-473 (2010)
It is argued that the Nash bargaining solution cannot serve as a principle of distributive justice because (i) it cannot secure stable cooperation in repeated interactions and (ii) it cannot capture our moral intuitions concerning distributive questions. In this article, I propose a solution to the first problem by amending the Nash bargaining solution so that it can maintain stable cooperation among rational bargainers. I call the resulting principle the stabilized Nash bargaining solution. The principle defends justice in the form 'each according to her basic needs and above this level according to her relative bargaining power'. In response to the second problem, I argue that the stabilized Nash bargaining solution can serve as a principle of distributive justice in certain situations where moral reasoning is reduced to instrumental reasoning. In particular, I argue that rational individuals would choose the stabilized Nash bargaining solution in Rawls' original position.
Keywords Contractualism  Rationality  Reasonableness  Stabilized Nash bargaining solution
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820810000348
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,442
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
John Rawls (2009). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jonathan Shalev (2002). Loss Aversion and Bargaining. Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.
Paul Weirich (1991). Contractiarianism and Bargaining Theory. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:369-385.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

119 ( #37,574 of 1,925,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

31 ( #13,643 of 1,925,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.