Orphan Papers and Ghostwriting: The Case against the ICMJE Criterion of Authorship

Accountability in Research 20 (2): 59-71 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although popular, I argue that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) account of authorship is flawed. It inadvertently allows for practices that it was designed to prevent. In addition, it creates a new category of authorless papers—orphan papers. The original World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) criterion is preferable.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,297

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acknowledgments through the prism of the ICMJE and ChatGPT.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & P. Tsigaris - 2024 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 5 (2):117-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barton Moffatt
Mississippi State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references