Beyond the Instinct-Inference Dichotomy: A Unified Interpretation of Peirce's Theory of Abduction

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 55 (2):138-160 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I examine and resolve an exegetical dichotomy between two main interpretations of Peirce’s theory of abduction, namely, the Generative Interpretation and the Pursuitworthiness Interpretation. According to the former, abduction is the instinctive process of generating explanatory hypotheses through a mental faculty called insight. According to the latter, abduction is a rule-governed procedure for determining the relative pursuitworthiness of available hypotheses and adopting the worthiest one for further investigation—such as empirical tests—based on economic considerations. It is shown that the Generative Interpretation is inconsistent with a fundamental fact of logic for Peirce—i.e., abduction is a kind of inference—and the Pursuitworthiness Interpretation is flawed and inconsistent with Peirce’s naturalistic explanation for the possibility of science and his view about the limitations of classical scientific method. Changing the exegetical locus classicus from the logical form of abduction to insight and economy of research, I argue for the Unified Interpretation according to which abduction includes both instinctive hypotheses-generation and rule-governed hypotheses-ranking. I show that the Unified Interpretation is immune to the objections raised successfully against the Generative and the Pursuitworthiness interpretations.

Similar books and articles

From ugly duckling to Swan: C. S. Peirce, abduction, and the pursuit of scientific theories.Daniel J. McKaughan - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (3):pp. 446-468.
Ampliative abduction.James Blachowicz - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):141 – 157.
Integrating Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation.Michael J. Shaffer - 2022 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 14 (2):1-18.
How did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation? Mcauliffe - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (3):300-319.
Abduction and Estimation in Animals.Woosuk Park - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (4):321-337.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-14

Downloads
539 (#35,658)

6 months
95 (#52,416)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mousa Mohammadian
American University of Beirut

Citations of this work

Putting inference to the best explanation into context.Leah Henderson - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94 (C):167-176.
Using Peircean abduction to understand teacher mentoring.Cathal de Paor - 2023 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 55 (1):89-99.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references