Does Aristotle’s Ethics Represent “Pharisaism”?: A Survey of Scheler’s Critique

Quaestiones Disputatae 3 (1):100-112 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is well known that Max Scheler framed his ethics in opposition to Kant’s “formalistic” ethical framework. However, it is a lesser-known fact that Scheler offered a critique of the ancient Greek moral vision. Although this critique was less developed than the one of Kant, the critique of the ancients was no less significant. First explicated in 1912 in Ressentiment, its central theme is reprised in nearly all of Scheler’s main texts even up until his death. Scheler’s contention is with what he calls the “love of goodness,” which he also happens to think Aristotle’s ethics represents. This paper will primarily examine the love of goodness, first, as one side of the “categorial form” of "Pharisaism"—that is, as it represents a “moral illusion”—then as the other side—namely, as it corresponds to “epistemological error." Finally, I consider the specific moral context in light of where it naturally leads Scheler: to the principle of solidarity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-26

Downloads
17 (#1,011,699)

6 months
4 (#1,457,267)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric J. Mohr
Saint Vincent College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references