Authors
Aydin Mohseni
University of Pittsburgh
Abstract
The practice of HARKing---hypothesizing after results are known---is commonly maligned as undermining the reliability of scientific findings. There are several accounts in the literature as to why HARKing undermines the reliability of findings. We argue that none of these is right and that the correct account is a Bayesian one. HARKing can indeed decrease the reliability of scientific findings, but it can also increase it; which effect HARKing produces depends on the difference of the prior odds of hypotheses characteristically selected ex ante and ex post to observing data. Further, we show how misdiagnosis of HARKing can lead to misprescription in the context of the replication crisis.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Costs of HARKing.Mark Rubin - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (2):535-560.
Something New Under the Sun.Margaret A. Farley - 2016 - Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (1):186-194.
Lamarck's Science of Living Bodies.M. J. S. Hodge - 1971 - British Journal for the History of Science 5 (4):323-352.
Michel de Montaigne: Accidental Philosopher.Ann Hartle - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
The Generality of Rights.Frederick Schauer - 2000 - Legal Theory 6 (3):323-336.
Fleck as a Theorist of Thought as Res Gestae – or, Does a Pair of Dots in Swedish Matter?Östlund David - 2016 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 1:12.
Truth. [REVIEW]M. D. P. [[sic]] - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):137-137.
Narrative as Motivator in Foreign Language Acquisition.Alin Cristian - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (1):165-189.
Popper's Fundamental Misdiagnosis of the Scientific Defects of Freudian Psychoanalysis.Adolf Grünbaum - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer. pp. 117--134.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-11

Total views
15 ( #700,660 of 2,518,243 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,243 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes