Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):53-73 (2005)
In this paper we discuss the application of a new machine learning approach – Argument Based Machine Learning – to the legal domain. An experiment using a dataset which has also been used in previous experiments with other learning techniques is described, and comparison with previous experiments made. We also tested this method for its robustness to noise in learning data. Argumentation based machine learning is particularly suited to the legal domain as it makes use of the justifications of decisions which are available. Importantly, where a large number of decided cases are available, it provides a way of identifying which need to be considered. Using this technique, only decisions which will have an influence on the rules being learned are examined.
|Keywords||argumentation legal information systems legal knowledge discovery machine learning rule induction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Padua: A Protocol for Argumentation Dialogue Using Association Rules. [REVIEW]Maya Wardeh, Trevor Bench-Capon & Frans Coenen - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):183-215.
Similar books and articles
Machine Learning Theory and Practice as a Source of Insight Into Universal Grammar. StuartmShieber - unknown
Explanation-Based Interpretation of Open-Textured Concepts in Logical Models of Legislation.Stefania Costantini & Gaetano Aurelio Lanzarone - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (3):191-208.
Machine Learning and the Foundations of Inductive Inference.F. Bergadano - 1993 - Minds and Machines 3 (1):31-51.
Using Machine Learning for Non-Sentential Utterance Classiﬁcation.Jonathan Ginzburg & Shalom Lappin - unknown
Choosing From Competing Theories in Computerised Learning.Abraham Meidan & Boris Levin - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (1):119-129.
A Dynamic Interaction Between Machine Learning and the Philosophy of Science.Jon Williamson - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (4):539-549.
An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems.John Zeleznikow - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):237-260.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #107,881 of 2,152,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #281,219 of 2,152,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.