HEC Forum 23 (4):257-268 (2011)

Authors
Guy Widdershoven
VU University Amsterdam
Abstract
Emotions play an important part in moral life. Within clinical ethics support (CES), one should take into account the crucial role of emotions in moral cases in clinical practice. In this paper, we present an Aristotelian approach to emotions. We argue that CES can help participants deal with emotions by fostering a joint process of investigation of the role of emotions in a case. This investigation goes beyond empathy with and moral judgment of the emotions of the case presenter. In a moral case deliberation, the participants are invited to place themselves in the position of the case presenter and to investigate their own emotions in the situation. It is about critically assessing the facts in the case that cause the emotion and the related (moral) thoughts that accompany the emotion. It is also about finding the right emotion in a given situation and finding the right balance in dealing with that emotion. These steps in the moral inquiry give rise to group learning. It is a process of becoming open towards the perspectives of others, leading to new insights into what is an appropriate emotion in the specific situation. We show how this approach works in moral case deliberation. A physician presents a situation in which he is faced with a pregnant woman who is about to deliver multiple extremely premature infants at the threshold of viability. The moral deliberation of the case and the emotions therein leads to the participants’ conclusion that “compassion” is a more adequate emotion than “sadness”. The emotion “sadness” is pointed towards the tragedy that is happening to the woman. The emotion “compassion” is pointed towards the woman; it combines consideration and professional responsibility. Through the shift towards compassion, participants experienced more creativity and freedom to deal with the sad situation and to support the woman. The paper ends with an analysis and reflection on the deliberation process. In the conclusion we argue for more attention to emotions in clinical ethics support and offer some directions for doing this in the right way
Keywords Emotions  Moral decision-making  Moral case deliberation  Clinical ethics support services  Sadness  Compassion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-011-9162-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,206
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Wahrheit und methode.Hans-Georg Gadamer - 1973 - Bijdragen 34 (2):118-122.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Emotions and Religious Ethics.Paul Lauritzen - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):307 - 324.
Dimensions of Moral Emotions.Kurt Gray & Daniel M. Wegner - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):258-260.
Are Envy, Anger, and Resentment Moral Emotions?Aaron Ben-Ze'ev - 2002 - Philosophical Explorations 5 (2):148 – 154.
Expendable Emotions.Kristján Kristjánsson - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):5-22.
Moral Education and the Emotions.John Martin Rich - 1980 - Journal of Moral Education 9 (2):81-87.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-09-17

Total views
188 ( #55,551 of 2,448,359 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,223 of 2,448,359 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes