Neural constructivism or self-organization?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):783-784 (2000)
Abstract
Three arguments are given to show that neural constructivism lacks an essential ingredient to explain cognitive development. Based on results in the theory of adaptive signal analysis, adaptive biological pattern information and self-organization in nonlinear systems of information processing, it is concluded that neural constructivism should be further extended to accommodate the occurrence of phase transitions generating qualitative development in the sense of Piaget.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00233451
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Moveable Feast.Peter F. Dominey - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):537-538.
Multiple Personalities and Views of Neural Organization.Rolf Kötter - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):545-546.
Organizing the Brain's Diversities.Michael A. Arbib & Peter Érdi - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):551-565.
Deconstructing Neural Constructivism.Olaf Sporns - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):576-577.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

14 ( #336,722 of 2,177,980 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,980 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums