Cliometrica 12:451–480 (2018)

Authors
Philippe Mongin
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Abstract
The paper has a twofold aim. On the one hand, it provides what appears to be the first game-theoretic modeling of Napoleon’s last campaign, which ended dramatically on 18 June 1815 at Waterloo. It is specifically concerned with the decision Napoleon made on 17 June 1815 to detach part of his army against the Prussians he had defeated, though not destroyed, on 16 June at Ligny. Military historians agree that this decision was crucial but disagree about whether it was rational. Hypothesizing a zero-sum game between Napoleon and Blücher, and computing its solution, we show that it could have been a cautious strategy on the former's part to divide his army, a conclusion which runs counter to the charges of misjudgement commonly heard since Clausewitz. On the other hand, the paper addresses methodological issues. We defend its case study against the objections of irrelevance that have been raised elsewhere against “analytic narratives”, and conclude that military campaigns provide an opportunity for successful application of the formal theories of rational choice. Generalizing the argument, we finally investigate the conflict between narrative accounts – the historians' standard mode of expression – and mathematical modeling.
Keywords analytic narrative  rational choice history  zero-sum games  models vs narratives  military strategy  Napoleon  Clausewitz  Waterloo
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Problems of Rationality.Donald Davidson - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Who is Fooled?Donald Davidson - 2004 - In Problems of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
Economic Analysis in Historical Perspective.Brian M. Downing - 2000 - History and Theory 39 (1):88–97.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philippe Mongin (1950-2020).Jean Baccelli & Marcus Pivato - 2021 - Theory and Decision 90 (1):1-9.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-30

Total views
1,698 ( #2,451 of 2,455,413 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
88 ( #7,334 of 2,455,413 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes