The Journal of Ethics 22 (3-4):283-310 (2018)

Authors
Judith Benz-Schwarzburg
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Susana Monsó
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Abstract
It has been argued that some animals are moral subjects, that is, beings who are capable of behaving on the basis of moral motivations. In this paper, we do not challenge this claim. Instead, we presuppose its plausibility in order to explore what ethical consequences follow from it. Using the capabilities approach, we argue that beings who are moral subjects are entitled to enjoy positive opportunities for the flourishing of their moral capabilities, and that the thwarting of these capabilities entails a harm that cannot be fully explained in terms of hedonistic welfare. We explore the implications of this idea for the assessment of current practices involving animals.
Keywords nonhuman animals  animal ethics  animal morality  moral emotions  capabilities approach  welfarism  harm
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10892-018-9275-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics.L. W. Sumner - 1996 - Oxford University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animal Moral Psychologies.Susana Monsó & Kristin Andrews - forthcoming - In John M. Doris & Manuel Vargas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
A Practice‐Focused Case for Animal Moral Agency.Dorna Behdadi - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (2):226-243.
Animal Cognition.Kristin Andrews - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Morality Without Mindreading.Susana Monsó - 2017 - Mind and Language 32 (3):338-357.
Empathy and Morality in Behaviour Readers.Susana Monsó - 2015 - Biology and Philosophy 30 (5):671-690.
Learning Ethics From Our Relationships with Animals: Moral Imagination.Maurice Hamington - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):177-188.
Animal Experimentation.Alastair Norcross - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Animal Morality: What is the Debate About?Simon Fitzpatrick - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1151-1183.
Moral Agency in Other Animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Beastly Morality: Animals as Ethical Agents.Jonathan K. Crane (ed.) - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
Does Fish Welfare Matter? On the Moral Relevance of Agency.Frederike Kaldewaij - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):63-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-27

Total views
294 ( #35,505 of 2,499,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #27,335 of 2,499,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes