Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78 (2010)

Authors
Abstract
In several recent issues of this journal, I argued for an account of property possession as strict, numerical identity. While this account has stuck some as being highly idiosyncratic in nature, it is not entirely something new under the sun, since as I will argue in this paper, it turns out to have a historic precedent in Plato⠀™ s theory of forms. Indeed, the purpose of this paper is twofold. The first is to show that my account of property possession can be utilized to provide a novel interpretation of Plato⠀™ s theory of forms. And the second is to show that once it has been divorced from a variety of implausible doctrines with which it has historically been wedded, Plato⠀™ s central insight that all properties possess themselves, far from being of mere historical interest, is independently plausible, ironically enough, even from an empirical point of view
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12133-010-0059-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,919
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Logical Parts.Laurie A. Paul - 2002 - Noûs 36 (4):578–596.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
117 ( #78,648 of 2,343,505 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #332,879 of 2,343,505 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes