Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):612-620 (2008)
Abstract: In this brief article, I claim that the Contribution Principle invoked by Christian Barry as a key principle for determining who owes what to the global destitute is mistaken as a definitive principle and unjustified as a provisional principle for dealing with global poverty. This principle assumes that merely causing, or contributing to the cause of, a state of affairs may be sufficient to have a special responsibility to bear the costs that this state of affairs entails. I argue that an agent will only have such a special responsibility if he or she has caused a state of affairs (for example, acute destitution) by violating a duty not to do so. Therefore, the Contribution Principle is mistaken. Finally, I tackle two possible responses to my argument. The first claims that states have a duty not to undertake actions that may cause, or contribute to the cause of, acute deprivations. The second claims that although the Contribution Principle may be mistaken as a definitive principle for dealing with global destitution, it is nonetheless correct as a provisional principle.
|Keywords||poverty responsibility causation compensation duties|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties.Thomas Pogge - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):55–83.
On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency.Saladin Meckled-Garcia - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3):245-271.
Justice and Responsibility.Arthur Ripstein - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 17 (2):361-386.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
602 and One Dead: On Contribution to Global Poverty and Liability to Defensive Force.Gerhard Øverland - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):279-299.
Global Systemic Problems and Interconnected Duties.Leslie Pickering Francis - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (2):115-128.
How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative?Pablo Gilabert - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537-550.
Self-Ownership and the State: A Democratic Critique.Lea Ypi - 2011 - Ratio 24 (1):91-106.
A Closer Look at the 'New' Principle.Michael Strevens - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):545-561.
The Difference Principle, Equality of Opportunity, and Cosmopolitan Justice.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):333-351.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #230,051 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?