Polynomial induction and length minimization in intuitionistic bounded arithmetic

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (1):73-76 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is shown that the feasibly constructive arithmetic theory IPV does not prove LMIN, unless the polynomial hierarchy CPV-provably collapses. It is proved that PV plus LMIN intuitionistically proves PIND. It is observed that PV + PIND does not intuitionistically prove NPB, a scheme which states that the extended Frege systems are not polynomially bounded

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preservation theorems for bounded formulas.Morteza Moniri - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (1):9-14.
On two questions about feasibly constructive arithmetic.Morteza Moniri - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (4):425.
The strength of sharply bounded induction.Emil Jeřábek - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (6):613-624.
Admissible closures of polynomial time computable arithmetic.Dieter Probst & Thomas Strahm - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (5):643-660.
Notes on polynomially bounded arithmetic.Domenico Zambella - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (3):942-966.
Time polynomial in input or output.Yuri Gurevich & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):1083-1088.
A new "feasible" arithmetic.Stephen Bellantoni & Martin Hofmann - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):104-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Preservation theorems for bounded formulas.Morteza Moniri - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (1):9-14.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references