In D. Dieks & P. Vermaas (eds.), The Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 307-318 (1998)

Bradley Monton
Wuhan University
The idea of self-measurement by a quantum-mechanical automaton is presented, and the conclusions that are typically reached about what we can come to know from doing self-measurements are shown to be mistaken. Specifically, it is shown that, while we are capable of _predicting_ and _measuring_ the values of two incompatible observables, we are incapable of _knowing_ both these values simultaneously. This is an example of the interesting limitations quantum mechanics places on knowledge.
Keywords David Albert
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Quantum-Mechanical Automation.David Z. Albert - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (4):577-585.
Retrocausality and Quantum Measurement.David T. Pegg - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (7):648-658.
The Projection Postulate: A New Perspective.Paul Teller - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):369-395.


Added to PP index

Total views
176 ( #52,052 of 2,385,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #16,492 of 2,385,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes