Two contextualist fallacies

Synthese 173 (3):317 - 333 (2010)
I examine the radical contextualists’ two main arguments for the semantic underdeterminacy thesis, according to which all, or almost all, English sentences lack context-independent truth conditions. I show that both arguments are fallacious. The first argument, which I call the fallacy of the many understandings , mistakenly infers that a sentence S is semantically incomplete from the fact that S can be used to mean different things in different contexts. The second argument, which I call the open texture fallacy , wrongly concludes that a sentence S lacks context-independent truth conditions from the fact that there are circumstances in which the truth value of S would be indeterminate. I do however defend the claim that a certain class of sentences not containing any indexicals do lack context-independent truth conditions, and put forward an argument to that effect. But this argument, as I show, does not generalize to all sentences, and thus fails to support the semantic underdeterminacy thesis.
Keywords Contextualism  Semantic underdeterminacy  Semantic incompleteness  Indeterminacy  Truth conditions  Open texture  Context sensitivity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-008-9426-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,146
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Conversational Impliciture.Kent Bach - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162.
Sense and Sensibilia.J. L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford University Press.
Minimal Semantics.Emma Borg - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Propositions, Semantic Values, and Rigidity.Dilip Ninan - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):401-413.
What is a Sophistical Refutation?David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Painted Leaves, Context, and Semantic Analysis.Stefano Predelli - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):351 - 374.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

90 ( #55,647 of 2,151,964 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

11 ( #59,585 of 2,151,964 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums