Dialectica 60 (4):383-396 (2006)
AbstractThe conservation of energy law, a law of physics that states that the total energy of any closed system is always conserved, is a bedrock principle that has achieved both broad theoretical and experimental support. Yet if interactive dualism is correct, it is thought that the mind can affect physical objects in violation of the conservation of energy. Thus, some claim, the conservation of energy grounds an argument for physicalism. Although critics of the argument focus on the implausibility of causation requiring the transference of energy, I argue that even if causation requires the transference of energy, once we accept the other required premises of the argument that lie behind any supposed argument from the conservation of energy the law of the conservation of energy is revealed as irrelevant to the question of whether the mental is physical.
Similar books and articles
What Does the Conservation of Energy Have to Do with Physicalism?Barbara Montero - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (4):383-396.
Conservation of Energy is Relevant to Physicalism.Ole Koksvik - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (4):573-582.
Closure Principles and the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum.Sophie Gibb - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):363-384.
Wavefunction Collapse and Conservation Laws.Philip Pearle - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (8):1145-1160.
Mind-Body Interactionism and the Conservation of Energy.Robert Larmer - 1986 - International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (September):277-85.
Conservation Laws and Interactionist Dualism.Ben White - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (267):387–405.
The Energy of the Universe.F. I. Cooperstock & M. Israelit - 1995 - Foundations of Physics 25 (4):631-635.
The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy with a Foreword by I. Bernard Cohen.Yehuda Elkana - 1974 - Hutchinson Educational.
Letters and Documents Regarding the Cold, Cruel, and Heartless Treatment of the Poor by Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation, a Subsidiary of Oneok, Inc.Dear Mr Farrell - unknown
Energy Localization in General Relativity: A New Hypothesis. [REVIEW]F. I. Cooperstock - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (8):1011-1024.
There is No Trace of Any Soul Linked to the Body.David Papineau - 2015 - In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 369-376.
(Bio)Fueling Farm Policy: The Biofuels Boom and the 2008 Farm Bill. [REVIEW]Nadine Lehrer - 2010 - Agriculture and Human Values 27 (4):427-444.
The Early Nineteenth Century Philosophical Background to the Emergence of Energy Conservation Theories Some Aspects of the Impact of Romanticism on Scientific Thought.Barry Gower - 1970
À propos de l’ouvrage d’Helmholtz Über die Erhaltung der Kraft sur un principe limité de la conservation de l’énergie.Muriel Guedj - 2007 - Philosophia Scientiae 11 (2):1-25.
Reflections on the deBroglie–Bohm Quantum Potential.Peter J. Riggs - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (1):21-39.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Panpsychism and Causation: A New Argument and a Solution to the Combination Problem.Hedda Hassel Mørch - 2014 - Dissertation, Oslo
Conservation Laws and the Philosophy of Mind: Opening the Black Box, Finding a Mirror.J. Brian Pitts - 2019 - Philosophia 48 (2):673-707.
Conservation of Energy: Missing Features in Its Nature and Justification and Why They Matter.J. Brian Pitts - 2021 - Foundations of Science 26 (3):559-584.
Mereological Nihilism and Personal Ontology.Andrew Brenner - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (268).
References found in this work
Summary of "Elements of Mind" and Replies to Critics.Tim Crane - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (11):223-240.
The Mind and its place in nature.C. D. Broad - 1925 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 103:145-146.