Espousing interactions and Fielding reactions: Addressing laypeople's beliefs about genetic determinism

Philosophical Psychology 21 (3):331 – 348 (2008)
Abstract
Although biologists and philosophers of science generally agree that genes cannot determine the forms of biological and psychological traits, students, journalists, politicians, and other members of the general public nonetheless continue to embrace genetic determinism. This article identifies some of the concerns typically raised by individuals when they first encounter the systems perspective that biologists and philosophers of science now favor over genetic determinism, and uses arguments informed by that perspective to address those concerns. No definitive statements can yet be made about why genetic determinism has proven so resilient in the face of empirical evidence pointing up its deficiencies, but conveying the essential interdependence of 'nature' and 'nurture' to the general public will likely require deployment of the arguments that systems theorists ordinarily use to reject genetic determinism. In addition, the elaboration of new metaphors that focus attention on the dynamic nature of trait construction will likely prove valuable, because re-conceptualizing notions like 'genes' and 'nature' will probably be one of the most effective ways to help students and the general public abandon the genetic determinism that biologists now recognize as indefensible.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515080802170127
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,687
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action.David Morris, E. Thelen & L. B. Smith - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2).

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Determinism, Omniscience, and the Multiplicity of Explanations.Mary Midgley - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):900-901.
Genetic Disease, Genetic Testing and the Clinician.Kelly C. Smith - 2001 - Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (1):91.
Free Will and the Genome Project.Patricia S. Greenspan - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1):31-43.
The Nature and Significance of Behavioural Genetic Information.Ainsley Newson - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111.
Genetic Prediction: What Are the Limits?M. O. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):619-633.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

57 ( #87,792 of 2,146,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #185,759 of 2,146,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums