Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):141-165 (2007)
Can a scientific naturalist be a mathematical realist? I review some arguments, derived largely from the writings of Penelope Maddy, for a negative answer. The rejoinder from the realist side is that the irrealist cannot explain, as well as the realist can, why a naturalist should grant the mathematician the degree of methodological autonomy that the irrealist's own arguments require. Thus a naturalist, as such, has at least as much reason to embrace mathematical realism as to embrace irrealism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Poincaré's Conception of the Objectivity of Mathematics.Janet Folina - 1994 - Philosophia Mathematica 2 (3):202-227.
Scientific Vs. Mathematical Realism: The Indispensability Argument.Michael Resnik - 1995 - Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):166-174.
Mathematical, Astrological, and Theological Naturalism.J. M. Dieterle - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):129-135.
Kitcher's Mathematical Naturalism.James Robert Brown - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-20.
From Metaphysical to Substantive Naturalism: A Case Study.Janice Dowell, J. L. - 2004 - Synthese 138 (2):149-173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #124,053 of 2,172,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?