Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):546-547 (2001)
Behavioral theorists such as B. F. Skinner have argued that the thesis of selection by consequences applies to behavior just as much as to morphology. This commentary specifically examines certain respects in which the thesis of “selection by consequences” applies to the development of ontogenic operant behavior
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Import of Skinner's Three-Term Contingency.Roy A. Moxley - 1996 - Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):145 - 167.
On the Origins of Complexity.Bruce E. Hesse & Gary Novak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):540-541.
Selection: Information and Replication of the Operant.Ralph Spiga - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):556-557.
Selection: Unexplored and Underexplored Realms.David A. Eckerman & Steven M. Kemp - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):536-537.
Is the Avoiding of Operant Theory a Pavlovian Conditioned Response?Claudia D. Cardinal, Matthew E. Andrzejewski & Philip N. Hineline - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):252-253.
Are Theories of Selection Necessary?H. S. Pennypacker - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):549-550.
Selection in Operant Learning May Fit a General Model.Julian C. Leslie - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):542-543.
Should We Essentially Ignore the Role of Stimuli in a General Account of Operant Selection?Rick A. Bevins - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):528-529.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #555,450 of 2,163,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?