Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law

Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383 (2010)
Abstract
Chaïm Perelman resuscitated the rhetorical tradition by developing an elegant and detailed theory of argumentation. Rejecting the single-minded Cartesian focus on rational truth, Perelman recovered the ancient wisdom that we can argue reasonably about matters that admit only of probability. From this one would conclude that Perelman's argumentation theory is inalterably opposed to natural law, and therefore that I would have done better to have written an article titled "Perelman's Theory of Argumentation as a Rejection of Natural Law."However, my thesis is precisely that Perelman's theory of argumentation connects to the natural law tradition in interesting and productive ways. Perelman referred to natural law in.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0383
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,587
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Legal Audiences.Fábio Perin Shecaira & Noel Struchiner - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (2):273-291.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
23 ( #251,725 of 2,235,707 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,711 of 2,235,707 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature