Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law

Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383 (2010)
Abstract
Chaïm Perelman resuscitated the rhetorical tradition by developing an elegant and detailed theory of argumentation. Rejecting the single-minded Cartesian focus on rational truth, Perelman recovered the ancient wisdom that we can argue reasonably about matters that admit only of probability. From this one would conclude that Perelman's argumentation theory is inalterably opposed to natural law, and therefore that I would have done better to have written an article titled "Perelman's Theory of Argumentation as a Rejection of Natural Law."However, my thesis is precisely that Perelman's theory of argumentation connects to the natural law tradition in interesting and productive ways. Perelman referred to natural law in.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0383
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,386
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Legal Audiences.Fábio Perin Shecaira & Noel Struchiner - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (2):273-291.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
23 ( #259,634 of 2,266,858 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #372,714 of 2,266,858 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature