Should We Aim for Consensus?

Episteme 7 (3):198-214 (2010)
Abstract
There can be good reasons to doubt the authority of a group of scientists. But those reasons do not include lack of unanimity among them. Indeed, holding science to a unanimity or near-unanimity standard has a pernicious effect on scientific deliberation, and on the transparency that is so crucial to the authority of science in a democracy. What authorizes a conclusion is the quality of the deliberation that produced it, which is enhanced by the presence of a non-dismissible minority. Scientists can speak as one in more ways than one. We recommend a different sort of consensus that is partly substantive and partly procedural. It is a version of what Margaret Gilbert calls “joint acceptance” – we call it “deliberative acceptance.” It capitalizes on there being a persistent minority, and thereby encourages accurate reporting of the state of agreement and disagreement among deliberators.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/epi.2010.0203
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,233
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
On Liberty and Other Essays.John Stuart Mill - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Ethics by Committee: The Moral Authority of Consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
Masking Disagreement Among Experts.John Beatty - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):52-67.
Objectivity, Disagreement, and Projectibility.Paul Seabright - 1988 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):25 – 51.
Hierarchy of Scientific Consensus and the Flow of Dissensus Over Time.Kyung-Man Kim - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (1):3-25.
The Epistemic Significance of Consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.
Pareto Unanimity and Consensus.Isaac Levi - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (9):481-492.
Bargaining and Strategic Demand Commitment.Daniel Cardona-Coll - 2003 - Theory and Decision 54 (4):357-374.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-10-27

Total downloads

71 ( #74,352 of 2,172,901 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,901 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums