Tinged shareholder theory: Or what's so special about stakeholders?

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):117–127 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper contrasts the normative foundations of the stakeholder and shareholder theories of the firm. It demonstrates how the shareholder theory of the firm appears to have at least as much normative support as stakeholder theory and suggests that a way forward may be for a variant of pure shareholder theory to emerge



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Participation and property rights.Sheldon Leader - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3):97 - 109.
Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business.Bruce Langtry - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):431-443.
The limits of shareholder value.Peter Koslowski - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.


Added to PP

76 (#218,640)

6 months
7 (#435,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoff Moore
Durham University

Citations of this work

The Stakeholder Model Refined.Yves Fassin - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):113-135.
Differentiating stakeholder theories.John Kaler - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (1):71 - 83.
Business Ethics and the 'End of History' in Corporate Law.Joseph Heath - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):5-20.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references