Geoff Moore
Durham University
This paper contrasts the normative foundations of the stakeholder and shareholder theories of the firm. It demonstrates how the shareholder theory of the firm appears to have at least as much normative support as stakeholder theory and suggests that a way forward may be for a variant of pure shareholder theory to emerge
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-8608.00136
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Stakeholder Model Refined.Yves Fassin - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):113-135.
A Model of Business Ethics.Göran Svensson & Greg Wood - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3):303 - 322.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Participation and Property Rights.Sheldon Leader - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3):97 - 109.
Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business.Bruce Langtry - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):431-443.
The Limits of Shareholder Value.Peter Koslowski - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.


Added to PP index

Total views
61 ( #174,946 of 2,448,708 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,641 of 2,448,708 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes