Why only common morality?

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (12):788-789 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Why Not Common Morality?’ revisits an important and enduring question: is medical ethics distinct from ‘everyday’ ethics? In her paper, Rosamond Rhodes undertakes the ambitious project of answering this question, in addition to clarifying what constitutes a profession, how professions differ from ‘roles’ and how medical ethics relates to medical professionalism. Rhodes aims to challenge the status quo within medical ethics by departing from the views of certain giants within the field. The paper’s central contention is that the ethics of everyday life and medical ethics are indeed distinct—the latter cannot be derived from the former and we consequently need a new theory of medical ethics. While I am sympathetic to the aims of the project and took no small delight in Rhodes’s gumption, the paper suffers from a number of issues. Putting aside the issue of whether Rhodes accurately represents the theories she critiques—and that is no small thing to set aside—first, many scholars have interrogated in great depth, and from many angles, the relationship between common morality and medical ethics.1–4 Scholarship from the philosophy of medicine, virtue ethics, role-differentiated ethics, narrative and care ethics has made a significant contribution to the projects of clarifying what is distinct about medical professionalism and understanding how we might subsequently treat ethical issues that arise in healthcare with due sensitivity to these myriad differences.5–10 Yet, Rhodes largely ignores this literature …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justifying group-specific common morality.Carson Strong - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):1-15.
Morality and literary criticism.T. J. Diffey - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (4):443-454.
Common morality and moral reform.K. A. Wallace - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.
The hedgehog and the Borg: Common morality in bioethics.John D. Arras - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):11-30.
Common Sense Morality versus Role Morality.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):133-143.
Traditional Morality and Sacred Values.David McPherson - 2017 - Analyse & Kritik 39 (1):41-62.
Common morality and computing.Bernard Gert - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):53-60.
Chapter 2. common morality and kant’s enlightenment project.Alan Donagan - 1992 - In Gene Outka & John P. Reeder (eds.), Prospects for a Common Morality. Princeton University Press. pp. 53-72.
Common morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress.Oliver Rauprich - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):43-71.
Chapter 1. common morality and the community of rights.Alan Gewirth - 1992 - In Gene Outka & John P. Reeder (eds.), Prospects for a Common Morality. Princeton University Press. pp. 29-52.
Egoism as a Theory of Human Motives.C. D. Broad - 1949 - Hibbert Journal 48:105-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-30

Downloads
12 (#929,405)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bryanna Moore
University of Texas Medical Branch

Citations of this work

Commentary: Medical Ethics: A Distinctive Species of Ethics.Leonard M. Fleck - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (3):421-425.
A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality.Rosamond Rhodes - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (12):792-793.
The Trusted Doctor: Medical Ethics and Professionalism by Rosamond Rhodes. [REVIEW]Elizabeth Lanphier - 2022 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 15 (2):174-178.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ethics of care: personal, political, and global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles.Justin Oakley & Dean Cocking - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dean Cocking.
Internal and external standards for medical morality.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):601 – 619.
Reviving A Distinctive Medical Ethic.Larry R. Churchill - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (3):28-34.

Add more references