A Good Enough Reason: Addiction, Agency and Criminal Responsibility

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (5):490 - 518 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


ABSTRACT The article begins by contrasting medical and moral views of addiction and how such views influence responsibility and policy analysis. It suggests that since addiction always involves action and action can always be morally evaluated, we must independently decide whether addicts do not meet responsibility criteria rather than begging the question and deciding by the label of ?disease? or ?moral weakness?. It then turns to the criteria for criminal responsibility and shows that the criteria for criminal responsibility, like the criteria for addiction, are all folk psychological. Therefore, any scientific information about addiction must be ?translated? into the law's folk psychological criteria. Distractions about responsibility are then quickly canvassed. Then it addresses the direct relation between addiction and criminal responsibility. It argues that most addicts retain sufficient rational and control capacities at the relevant times to be held responsible, especially for crimes that are not part of the definition of addiction itself. It suggests that there is good reason to excuse or mitigate addicts for the crimes of purchase and possession for personal use. It concludes by briefly considering what contemporary science can contribute to our understanding of addiction and agency



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Addiction and Responsibility: A Survey of Opinions.Hans Olav Melberg, Edmund Henden & Olav Gjelsvik - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (5):558 - 570.
Philosophy, Addiction and Inquiry.Olav Gjelsvik - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (5):417 - 427.
Addiction: An Emergent Consequence of Elementary Choice Principles.Gene M. Heyman - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (5):428 - 445.
Addiction and Responsibility. [REVIEW]Joanna Korman - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (6):930-934.
Addiction, Compulsion, and Agency.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Neuroethics 7 (1):105-107.
Addiction and Self-Determination: A Phenomenological Approach.Jann E. Schlimme - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):49-62.
Failed Agency and the Insanity Defence.Steve Matthews - 2004 - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 27:413-424.
Perception of Addiction and Its Effects on One's Moral Responsibility.Justin Caouette & David Boutland - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (3):43-44.


Added to PP

52 (#224,228)

6 months
3 (#211,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Brain Privacy and the Case of Cannibal Cop.Mark Tunick - 2017 - Res Publica 23 (2):179-196.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Belief.Galen Strawson - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
In Praise of Blame.George Sher - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):19-30.
Coercion.Alan Wertheimer - 1990 - Princeton University Press.
Freedom and Belief, Galen Strawson. [REVIEW]Stephen L. White - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (1):119-122.

View all 19 references / Add more references