Are omnipotence and necessary moral perfection compatible? Reply to Mawson

Religious Studies 39 (4):441-449 (2003)
In response to an earlier paper of mine, T. J. Mawson has argued that omnipotence is logically incompatible with wrong-doing, ‘whilst accepting that there is “a genuine, active power knowingly to choose evil” and thus leaving room for a free-will defence to the problem of evil’. Here, I attempt to show that Mawson is mistaken on both counts – that his argument for the incompatibility of omnipotence and wrong-doing is defective, and that the free-will defence cannot be sustained on the ground marked out by him. Given Mawson's understanding of power and freedom, I argue that it would be possible for God to create persons who are both free and unable to make evil choices.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S003441250300670X
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,463
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
T. J. Mawson (2008). Divine Eternity. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (1):35-50.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

45 ( #107,987 of 1,925,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #124,726 of 1,925,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.