Religious Beliefs Inspire Sustainable HOPE (Help Ourselves Protect the Environment): Culture, Religion, Dogma, and Liturgy—The Matthew Effect in Religious Social Responsibility
Journal of Business Ethics:1-21 (forthcoming)
AbstractChina has achieved economic prominence but damaged the natural environment. Can religions excite pro-environmental actions? Chinese religion encompasses Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, native Taoism, and indigenous folk beliefs. We theorize that believers demonstrate more sustainable HOPE than non-believers. Religions with standardized and formal liturgy show more pro-environmental HOPE than those without it. We challenge the myth that the believers of Christianity and Islam display more sustainable HOPE than other faith. The 2013 Chinese General Social Survey revealed that 11.10% of them have faith. Believers display higher levels of HOPE than atheists, demonstrating the religion effect. Among believers, native Taoism and Buddhism exhibit more ecological HOPE than other religions, supporting the dogma effect in the Chinese culture. Religions with formalized liturgy demonstrate more pro-environmental HOPE than generalized folk beliefs—GuanDi and Mazu, validating the liturgy effect. Females, married, and people with good income, education, health, and country-domicile—the haves—exhibit robust ecological HOPE. The rich get richer and greener. However, those who are older, males, urban residents, and the Han majority do not. We empirically demonstrate the Matthew Effect in Religious Social Responsibility: Religious faith facilitates believers’ pro-environmental behaviors—HOPE and ethical behaviors in China.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
References found in this work
The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.Lynn White Jr - forthcoming - Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application, Belmont: Wadsworth Company.
The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. White, Jr & Lynn - 1967 - Science 155 (3767):1203--1207.
Business Ethics and Religion: Religiosity as a Predictor of Ethical Awareness Among Students. [REVIEW]Stephen J. Conroy & Tisha L. N. Emerson - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):383-396.
Intelligence Vs. Wisdom: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, and Unethical Behavior Across College Major and Gender.Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Yuh-Jia Chen - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):1-26.
Religion as a Macro Social Force Affecting Business: Concepts, Questions, and Future Research.Raza Mir, Jawad Syed & Harry J. Van Buren - 2020 - Business and Society 59 (5):799-822.
Citations of this work
Holistic Thinking and Risk-Taking Perceptions Reduce Risk-Taking Intentions: Ethical, Financial, and Health/Safety Risks Across Genders and Cultures.Jingqiu Chen, Thomas Li-Ping Tang & ChaoRong Wu - forthcoming - Asian Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Religion and Religious Beliefs as Evolutionary Adaptations.Konrad Szocik - 2017 - Zygon 52 (1):24-52.
On Blanket Statements About the Epistemic Effects of Religious Diversity.Andrew Koehl - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (4):395-414.
A Transformative Theory of Religious Freedom: Promoting the Reasons for Rights.Corey Brettschneider - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (2):187-213.
On Literal and Non- Literal Interpretation of Religious Beliefs.Konrad Waloszczyk - 2009 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 70:267 - 283.
The Cognitive Biases of Human Mind in Accepting and Transmitting Religious and Theological Beliefs: An Analysis Based on the Cognitive Science of Religion.Sayyed M. Biabanaki - 2020 - Hts Theological Studies 76 (1):1-9.
Elements of the Orthodox Communication System.Mariya S. Petrushkevych - 2006 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 39:79-92.
Three Traditions of Moral Thought.John J. O’Meara - 1959 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 9:230-233.
Religious Evidentialism.Katherine Dormandy - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):63--86.
Ethno-Religious Conflict and Sustainable Development in Nigeria.Peace N. Ngwoke & Ezichi A. Ituma - 2020 - Hts Theological Studies 76 (4).
Religious Belief is Not Natural. Why Cognitive Science of Religion Does Not Show That Religious Belief is Rational.Hans Van Eyghen - 2016 - Studia Humana 5 (4):34-44.
Religious Pluralism and Inter-Religious Dialogue Iosr.Manas Kumar Sahu - 2019 - IOSR Journal of HumanitieS and Social Science 24 (7):57-62.
First-Order Theistic Religion: Intentional Power Beyond Belief.Paul K. Moser - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (3):31-48.
Religion in Family Relations- Right of the Child to Choose Religion and/or Right of Parents to Raise the Child According to Their Own Religious Beliefs.Uroš Novaković - 2018 - The Politics and Religion Journal 12 (1):151-184.