Classical Quarterly 36 (01):182- (1986)

In classical antiquity Propertius' eloquence was renowned. His successor Ovid referred to the blandi praecepta Properti and to blandi…Propertius oris . Quintilian stated that to his taste the most tersus and elegans Latin elegist was Tibullus, but sunt qui Propertium malint. Martial mentioned the facundi carmen iuuenale Properti. Turn now from the opinions of ancient authors to those of some modern commentators as they try to elucidate various passages as presented in the extant manuscripts, and you encounter not the adjectives blandus, tersus, elegans, and facundus, but ‘strange’, ‘obscure’, ‘odd’, ‘slovenly’, and the like. A major reason for such striking differences of opinion should be evident. Ovid, to whom Propertius was blandi oris, read a text separated from Propertius' autograph by at most a few decades. Modern scholars, however, must form their text from a few relatively late manuscripts, none earlier than c. 1200, in which Propertius' eloquence has been obscured by over twelve centuries of careless blundering and deliberate interpolation by a succession of scribes. A generally accepted example of deliberate interpolation in the Propertian archetype is found at 2.32.3-6: nam quid Praenesti dubias, o Cynthia, sortes, quid petis Aeaei moenia Telegoni? cur tua te Herculeum deportant esseda Tibur? Appia cur totiens te uia †ducit anum†? , where the name of some neighbouring town is required in the fourth verse to balance Praeneste, Tusculum, and Herculeum in the preceding three
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838800010648
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,646
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

raeca in Homeri Iliadem.J. T. Hooker - 1976 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 96:165.
Propertiana.D. R. Shackleton Bailey - 1945 - Classical Quarterly 39 (3-4):119-122.
Notes on the Christian Poems of Dracontius.A. Williams-Hudson - 1947 - Classical Quarterly 41 (3-4):95-.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interpretations Propertianae.W. R. Smyth - 1949 - Classical Quarterly 43 (3-4):118-.
Interpretationes Propertianae II.W. R. Smyth - 1951 - Classical Quarterly 1 (1-2):74-.
Vindiciae Propertianae.—II.J. P. Postgate - 1901 - The Classical Review 15 (08):406-413.
Vindiciae Propertianae.—III.J. P. Postgate - 1902 - The Classical Review 16 (06):306-315.
On the Cruces of Horace, Satires, 2. 2.A. Y. Campbell - 1951 - Classical Quarterly 1 (3-4):136-.
Three Cruces in Juvenal1.Michael Hendry - 1998 - Classical Quarterly 48 (01):252-.
Two Cruces in the Ars Amatoria.E. Courtney - 1970 - The Classical Review 20 (01):10-11.
Some Cruces in Virgil Re-Considered.J. S. Phillimore - 1916 - The Classical Review 30 (5-6):146-152.
Some Cruces in Catullus Reconsidered.J. S. Phillimore - 1916 - The Classical Review 30 (07):186-189.
Mvlier Aries, and Other Cruces in Catvllvs.O. L. Richmond - 1919 - Classical Quarterly 13 (3-4):134-.
Some 'Cruces' of Aeschylus' Persae.Albert J. Carnoy - 1917 - The Classical Review 31 (5-6):113-117.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #827,356 of 2,385,996 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #555,436 of 2,385,996 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes