Exploring biopower in the regulation of farm animal bodies: genetic policy interventions in UK livestock

Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (2):82-98 (2007)

Abstract
This paper explores the analytical relevance of Foucault’s notion of biopower in the context of regulating and managing non-human lives and populations, specifically those animals that are the focus of livestock breeding based on genetic techniques. The concept of biopower is seen as offering theoretical possibilities precisely because it is concerned with the regulation of life and of populations. The paper approaches the task of testing the ‘analytic mettle’ of biopower through an analysis of four policy documents concerned with farm animal genetics: the UK’s National Scrapie Plan ; the UK National Action Plan on Farm Animal Genetic Resources ; the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Committee’s report on Animals and Biotechnology ; and the Farm Animal Welfare Council’s report on the Welfare Implications of Animal Breeding and Breeding Technologies in Commercial Agriculture . Of interest is whether and how the four policy case studies articulate a form of biopower in relation to human-livestock animal relations in the context of genetic approaches to livestock breeding, and how biopower is variably expressed in relation to the different policy issues addressed. In concluding, the paper considers the overall applicability and relevance of biopower in the context of regulating animal lives within livestock breeding, highlighting both possibilities and limitations, and offers suggestions for taking forward research on livestock populations from a neo-Foucaultian perspective
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1186/1746-5354-3-2-82
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,305
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Understanding Foucault.Geoff Danaher - 2000 - Sage Publications.
Animal Futures : Public Attitudes and Sensibilities Towards Animals and Biotechnology on Contemporary Britain.Philip Macnaghten - 2001 - Ieppp Report for the Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology Commission.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gm Animals – Another Gm Crops?Ann Bruce - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (3):1-13.
The Market for Animal Welfare.Jayson L. Lusk - 2011 - Agriculture and Human Values 28 (4):561-575.
Sustainable Agriculture is Humane, Humane Agriculture is Sustainable.Michael C. Appleby - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):293-303.
Animal Welfare and Ethics Resources for Youth and College Agricultural Educators.Cynthia Petrie Smith - 2000 - U.S. Dept. Of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Agricultural Library, Animal Welfare Information Center.
For the Love of Goats: The Advantages of Alterity. [REVIEW]Ann Finan - 2011 - Agriculture and Human Values 28 (1):81-96.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
3 ( #1,159,441 of 2,254,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #775,279 of 2,254,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature