Evidence of expert's evidence is evidence

Episteme 13 (2):208-218 (2016)

Authors
Luca Moretti
University of Aberdeen
Abstract
John Hardwig has championed the thesis (NE) that evidence that an expert EXP has evidence for a proposition P, constituted by EXP’s testimony that P, is not evidence for P itself, where evidence for P is generally characterized as anything that counts towards establishing the truth of P. In this paper, I first show that (NE) yields tensions within Hardwig’s overall view of epistemic reliance on experts and makes it imply unpalatable consequences. Then, I use Shogenji-Roche’s theorem of transitivity of incremental confirmation to show that (NE) is false if a natural Bayesian formalization of the above notion of evidence is implemented. I concede that Hardwig could resist my Bayesian objection if he re-interpreted (NE) as a more precise thesis that only applies to community-focused evidence. I argue, however, that this precisification, while diminishing the philosophical relevance of (NE), wouldn’t settle the tensions internal to Hardwig’s views.
Keywords expert testimony  testimonial evidence  transitivity of confirmation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1017/epi.2015.42
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemological Puzzles About Disagreement.Richard Feldman - 2006 - In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press. pp. 216-236.
The Role of Trust in Knowledge.John Hardwig - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (12):693-708.
Epistemic Dependence.John Hardwig - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (7):335-349.
Epistemology Futures.Stephen Hetherington (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Evidence of Evidence as Higher Order Evidence.Anna-Maria A. Eder & Peter Brössel - 2019 - In Mattias Skipper & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Higher-Order Evidence: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 62-83.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Experts, Evidence, and Epistemic Independence.Ben Almassi - 2007 - Spontaneous Generations 1 (1):58-66.
Conhecimento por especialista, evidência e informação.Tommaso Piazza - 2010 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 55 (2):42-59.
The Epistemology of Scientific Evidence.Douglas Walton & Nanning Zhang - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (2):173-219.
Causation, Association, and Confirmation.Gregory Wheeler & Richard Scheines - 2010 - In Stephan Hartmann, Marcel Weber, Wenceslao Gonzalez, Dennis Dieks & Thomas Uebe (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation: New Trends and Old Ones Reconsidered. Springer. pp. 37--51.
English Law's Epistemology of Expert Testimony.Tony Ward - 2006 - Journal of Law and Society 33 (4):572-595.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-28

Total views
588 ( #7,937 of 2,309,223 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
78 ( #7,904 of 2,309,223 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature