Synthese 176 (1):5 - 21 (2010)

Adam Morton
PhD: Princeton University; Last affiliation: University of British Columbia
Is there such a thing as bounded rationality? I first try to make sense of the question, and then to suggest which of the disambiguated versions might have answers. We need an account of bounded rationality that takes account of detailed contingent facts about the ways in which human beings fail to perform as we might ideally want to. But we should not think in terms of rules or norms which define good responses to an individual's limitations, but rather in terms of desiderata, situations that limited agents can hope to achieve, and corresponding virtues of achieving them. We should not take formal theories defining optimal behavior in watered-down bounded form, even though they can impose enormous computational or cognitive demands
Keywords Bounded rationality  Mistakes  Optimality  Cognitive limitations  Intellectual power  Accuracy  Norms of reason
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9481-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Oughts, Options, and Actualism.Frank Jackson & Robert Pargetter - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):233-255.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reasoning with Heuristics.Brett Karlan - 2020 - Ratio 34 (2):100-108.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
265 ( #42,390 of 2,533,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #60,745 of 2,533,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes