Classical Quarterly 38 (02):565- (1988)

caue, caue; namque in malos asperrimus parata tollo cornua, qualis Lycambae spretus infido gener aut acer hostis Bupalo. an, si quis atra dente me petiuerit, inultus ut flebo puer? Harrison observes that commentators translate ‘“inultus” not “unavenged” but “without taking revenge”, construing it with Horace as the subject of “flebo” and not with “puer”’, and he then asserts ‘This use of “inultus” is wholly unparalleled; the adjective is elsewhere always used passively of persons or objects unavenged and never in the active sense of “unavenging”’
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S000983880003723X
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,646
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A or AB in Horace. Epod. 17. 24.John O. Rolfe - 1900 - The Classical Review 14 (05):261-.
Critical Notices.Horace Meyer Kallen - 1910 - Mind 19 (1):97-105.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #929,898 of 2,385,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #555,436 of 2,385,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes