How Frequently do Allegations of Scientific Misconduct Occur in Ecology and Evolution, and What Happens Afterwards?
Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):93-96 (2013)
AbstractScientific misconduct obstructs the advance of knowledge in science. Its impact in some disciplines is still poorly known, as is the frequency in which it is detected. Here, I examine how frequently editors of ecology and evolution journals detect scientist misconduct. On average, editors managed 0.114 allegations of misconduct per year. Editors considered 6 of 14 allegations (42.9%) to be true, but only in 2 cases were the authors declared guilty, the remaining being dropped for lack of proof. The annual rate of allegations that were probably warranted was 0.053, although the rate of demonstrated misconduct was 0.018, while the rate of false or erroneous allegations was 0.024. Considering that several cases of misconduct are probably not reported, these findings suggest that editors detect less than one-third of all fraudulent papers
Similar books and articles
Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct.Michael C. Loui - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):529-539.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
Responding to allegations of scientific misconduct: The procedure at the French national medical and health research institute.Jean-Philippe Breittmayer, Martine Bungener, Hugues De The, Evelyne Eschwege, Michel Fougereau, Gilles Guedj, Claude Kordon, Olivier Philippe, Maric-Catherine Postel-Vinay & Laurence Schaffar-Esterle - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):41-48.
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students.Debra M. Parrish - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):483-491.
The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?James S. Lubalin & Jennifer L. Matheson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):229-250.
Accountability and responsibility in research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
The medical research council’s approach to allegations of scientific misconduct.Imogen Evans - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):91-94.
Effectiveness of research guidelines in prevention of scientific misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Misconduct in science and the German law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct.Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7.
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review.John E. Dahlberg & Nancy M. Davidian - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):713-735.
Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct.Anne Victoria Neale, Rhonda K. Dailey & Judith Abrams - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):251-261.
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?Nicholas H. Steneck - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On Some Possible Ramifications of the “Microplastics in Fish” Case.Bor Tang - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1303-1310.
References found in this work
Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. [REVIEW]Nicholas H. Steneck - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):53-74.
A case for a duty to feed the hungry: GM plants and the third world.Lucy Carter - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):69-82.