Hybrid Speech Acts: A Theory of Normative Thought and Language That ‘Has It Both Ways’

European Journal of Philosophy 24 (4) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay, I propose a novel hybrid metanormative theory. According to this theory, speakers making normative claims express both cognitive and motivational attitudes in virtue of the constitutive norms of the particular speech acts they perform. This view has four principal virtues: it is consistent with traditional semantic theories, it supports a form of motivational judgment internalism that does justice to externalist intuitions, it illuminates the connection between normative language and normative thought, and it explains how speakers can express different conative states when speaking in different normative domains. In the first section, I discuss the theories of Stephen Finlay and David Copp. I show that they each come very close to having it both ways but ultimately fail. Understanding the shortcomings of these views is instrumental to a clear presentation of my own Hybrid Speech Act theory in section two. In the final section, I demonstrate how my view achieves its four advantages.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Speech acts.Mitchell S. Green - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Pragmatics of Normative Disagreement.Stephen Finlay - 2014 - In Guy Fletcher & Michael Ridge (eds.), Having It Both Ways: Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 124-148.
On Performative in Legal Discourse.L. Fiorito - 2006 - Metalogicon 2:101-112.
Pure versus Hybrid Expressivism and the Enigma of Conventional Implicature.Stephen Barker - 2014 - In Guy Fletcher & Michael Ridge (eds.), Having It Both Ways: Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 199-222.
Speech Acts in Literature.Joseph Hillis Miller - 2001 - Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-01

Downloads
34 (#448,660)

6 months
6 (#448,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Morgan
Birmingham-Southern College

References found in this work

Reason in philosophy: animating ideas.Robert Brandom - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Thought and Language.A. L. Wilkes, L. S. Vygotsky, E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (55):178.
The myth of conventional implicature.Kent Bach - 1999 - Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):327-366.
Asserting.Robert Brandom - 1983 - Noûs 17 (4):637-650.

View all 31 references / Add more references