Hybrid Speech Acts: A Theory of Normative Thought and Language That ‘Has It Both Ways’

European Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):785-807 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this essay, I propose a novel hybrid metanormative theory. According to this theory, speakers making normative claims express both cognitive and motivational attitudes in virtue of the constitutive norms of the particular speech acts they perform. This view has four principal virtues: it is consistent with traditional semantic theories, it supports a form of motivational judgment internalism that does justice to externalist intuitions, it illuminates the connection between normative language and normative thought, and it explains how speakers can express different conative states when speaking in different normative domains. In the first section, I discuss the theories of Stephen Finlay and David Copp. I show that they each come very close to having it both ways but ultimately fail. Understanding the shortcomings of these views is instrumental to a clear presentation of my own Hybrid Speech Act theory in section two. In the final section, I demonstrate how my view achieves its four advantages.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,215

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Speech acts.Mitchell S. Green - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Speech Acts: The Contemporary Theoretical Landscape.Daniel W. Harris, Daniel Fogal & Matt Moss - 2018 - In Daniel Fogal, Matt Moss & Daniel Harris (eds.), New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The Pragmatics of Normative Disagreement.Stephen Finlay - 2014 - In Guy Fletcher & Michael Ridge (eds.), Having It Both Ways: Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 124-148.
II—Jane Heal: Illocution, Recognition and Cooperation.Jane Heal - 2013 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1):137-154.
On Performative in Legal Discourse.L. Fiorito - 2006 - Metalogicon 2:101-112.


Added to PP

44 (#267,475)

6 months
3 (#225,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Morgan
University of Alabama, Huntsville

Citations of this work

Plato's Revenge: Moral Deliberation As Dialogical Activity.Andrew Morgan - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1):69-89.

Add more citations