Is Continuous Sedation at the End of Life an Ethically Preferable Alternative to Physician-Assisted Suicide?

American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):32 - 40 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The relatively new practice of continuous sedation at the end of life (CS) is increasingly being debated in the clinical and ethical literature. This practice received much attention when a U.S. Supreme Court ruling noted that the availability of CS made legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) unnecessary, as CS could alleviate even the most severe suffering. This view has been widely adopted. In this article, we perform an in-depth analysis of four versions of this ?argument of preferable alternative.? Our goal is to determine the extent to which CS can be considered to be an alternative to PAS and to identify the grounds, if any, on which CS may be ethically preferable to PAS



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is a death with dignity?Jyl Gentzler - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (4):461 – 487.
Ending Life, Morality, and Meaning.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):559-574.
What does a `right' to physician-assisted suicide (PAS) legally entail?M. T. Harvey - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):271-286.


Added to PP

77 (#159,378)

6 months
1 (#451,971)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sigrid Sterckx
University of Ghent