Is ‘Equal Pay for Equal Work’ Merely a Principle of Nondiscrimination?

Economics and Philosophy 32 (3):435-461 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Should people who perform equal work receive equal pay? Most would say ‘yes’, at least insofar as this question is understood to be asking whether employers should be permitted to discriminate against employees on the basis of race or sex. But suppose the employees belong to all of the same traditionally protected groups. Is (what I call) nondiscriminatory unequal pay for equal work wrong? Drawing an analogy with price discrimination, I argue that it is not intrinsically wrong, but it can be deceptive, in which case it is wrong.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,925

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-01

Downloads
99 (#227,481)

6 months
11 (#332,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Moriarty
Bentley University

Citations of this work

CEO Pay and the Argument from Peer Comparison.Joakim Sandberg & Alexander Andersson - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 175 (4):759-771.
Pay Secrecy, Discrimination, and Autonomy.Matthew Caulfield - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 171 (2):399-420.
The Ethics of Noncompete Clauses.Harrison Frye - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (2):229-249.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What is the point of equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Exploitation.Alan Wertheimer - 1996 - Princeton University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references