Is schema theory an appropriate framework for modeling the organization of the brain?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):547-548 (2000)
Abstract
This review evaluates pros and cons of the schema theory as a general framework for expressing what Arbib et al. call “systems neuroscience.” We discuss the software/hardware duality of the schema concept and the relative neglect of the mechanical properties of muscles. We propose a computational alternative to the functional decomposition in terms of schemas.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00383364
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,233
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Schema Theory: Very Promising.Alexander Grunewald - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):542-543.
Emulator as Body Schema.Virginia Slaughter - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):415-416.
Schemata in Social Science. Part Two: Metatheoretical.J. O. Wisdom - 1981 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):3 – 19.
Organizing the Brain's Diversities.Michael A. Arbib & Peter Érdi - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):551-565.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

21 ( #238,244 of 2,172,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #324,901 of 2,172,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums