Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):129-148 (2007)
Many scholars, in view of the close link that he draws between morality and freedom, argue that Kant does not think that there are free choices between nonmoral ends. On this view, Kant only posits a freedom to resist our desires and act morally. We are still responsible for immoral choices because we always have the power to act morally. Henry Allison has opposed this reading by arguing that Kant grounds a notion of nonmoral freedom in the Incorporation Thesis. In this paper, I criticize Allison’s argument and then try to replace it with an alternative that grounds nonmoral freedom in morality
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Commentary of Kant's Critique of Practical Reason.Lewis White Beck - 1960 - University of Chicago Press.
Motivation, Metaphysics, and the Value of the Self: A Reply to Ginsborg, Guyer, and Schneewind.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1998 - Ethics 109 (1):49-66.
The Inner Freedom of Virtue.Stephen Engstrom - 2002 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant and Hegel on Freedom: Two New Interpretations.Karl Ameriks - 1992 - Inquiry 35 (2):219 – 232.
The Problem of Agency and the Problem of Accountability in Kant's Moral Philosophy.Iuliana Corina Vaida - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):110-137.
The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in Groundwork III.Sergio Tenenbaum - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):555-589.
What Nature Makes of Her: Kant's Gendered Metaphysics.Inder S. Marwah - 2013 - Hypatia 28 (3):551-567.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #101,866 of 2,164,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #50,913 of 2,164,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?