Motion perception as inconsistent

Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):913-924 (2013)
Abstract
This paper offers an inconsistent model of motion perception. It was prompted by work on inconsistent motion due to Hegel and, following him, Priest. But the paper skirts Hegel's full scale idealism, by proposing that the inconsistency is with the cognitive contents of motion perception. The paper draws on work in the psychology of perception, and in the theory of inconsistency. I begin by noting the prima facie argument that temporal change threatens inconsistency, and canvassing ways in which this might be avoided. The orthodox reply to the prima facie argument is that one and the same thing can have different incompatible properties at different times. This is plausible when applied to motion in the physical world. However, applied to cognition, it can be seen that the phenomenon of phi or beta, combined with the mechanism of a Reichardt detector, lends support to one key step in the prima facie argument, namely re-identification over time. The inconsistency of the model is then seen to follow from application of the Fade Principle. Advantages of the model are stressed: including a simple explanation of the debilitating condition of akinetopsia, that is, motion blindness; and a suggestion as to how to account for the “moving now.”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2012.696328
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,492
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
An Anthropologist on Mars.O. Sacks & A. Freeman - 1994 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (2):234-240.
Science of Logic.M. J. Petry, G. W. F. Hegel, A. V. Miller & J. N. Findlay - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (80):273.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Perceiving and Describing Motion Events.Shulan Lu & Donald R. Franceschetti - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):295-296.
The Leibniz Continuity Condition, Inconsistency and Quantum Dynamics.Chris Mortensen - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):377-389.
Is Blindsight Motion Blind?Alan Cowey & Paul Azzopardi - 2001 - In Beatrice De Gelder, Edward H. F. De Haan & Charles A. Heywood (eds.), Out of Mind: Varieties of Unconscious Processes. Oxford University Press. pp. 87-103.
Aristotle on Time: A Study of the Physics.Tony Roark - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Concepts in Perception.Tim Crane - 1988 - Analysis 48 (June):150-53.
Motion Percepts: “Sense Specific,” “Kinematic,” or . . . ?A. H. Wertheim - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):338-340.
Evolutionary Internalized Regularities.Robert Schwartz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):626-628.
Added to PP index
2012-06-22

Total downloads
16 ( #303,135 of 2,180,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #50,834 of 2,180,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums