Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):913-924 (2013)
This paper offers an inconsistent model of motion perception. It was prompted by work on inconsistent motion due to Hegel and, following him, Priest. But the paper skirts Hegel's full scale idealism, by proposing that the inconsistency is with the cognitive contents of motion perception. The paper draws on work in the psychology of perception, and in the theory of inconsistency. I begin by noting the prima facie argument that temporal change threatens inconsistency, and canvassing ways in which this might be avoided. The orthodox reply to the prima facie argument is that one and the same thing can have different incompatible properties at different times. This is plausible when applied to motion in the physical world. However, applied to cognition, it can be seen that the phenomenon of phi or beta, combined with the mechanism of a Reichardt detector, lends support to one key step in the prima facie argument, namely re-identification over time. The inconsistency of the model is then seen to follow from application of the Fade Principle. Advantages of the model are stressed: including a simple explanation of the debilitating condition of akinetopsia, that is, motion blindness; and a suggestion as to how to account for the “moving now.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent.G. Priest, R. Routley & J. Norman (eds.) - 1989 - Philosophia Verlag.
An Anthropologist on Mars.O. Sacks & A. Freeman - 1994 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (2):234-240.
Science of Logic.M. J. Petry, G. W. F. Hegel, A. V. Miller & J. N. Findlay - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (80):273.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Perceiving and Describing Motion Events.Shulan Lu & Donald R. Franceschetti - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):295-296.
To What Extent Do Beliefs Affect Apparent Motion?Richard D. Wright & Michael R. W. Dawson - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):471-491.
The Leibniz Continuity Condition, Inconsistency and Quantum Dynamics.Chris Mortensen - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):377-389.
A Binocular Rivalry Study of Motion Perception in the Human Brain.K. Moutoussis, G. A. Keliris, Z. Kourtzi & N. K. Logothetis - 2005 - Vision Research 45 (17):2231-43.
Striate Cortex (V1) Activity Gates Awareness of Motion.Juha Silvanto, Alan Cowey, Nilli Lavie & Vincent Walsh - 2005 - Nature Neuroscience 8 (2):143-144.
Measurement Theory is a Poor Model of the Relation of Kinematic Geometry and Perception of Motion.Dejan Todorovic - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):705-706.
Levels of Perception: A Festschrift for Ian Howard.L. Harris & M. Jenkin (eds.) - 2003 - Springer Verlag.
Is Blindsight Motion Blind?Alan Cowey & Paul Azzopardi - 2001 - In Beatrice De Gelder, Edward H. F. De Haan & Charles A. Heywood (eds.), Out of Mind: Varieties of Unconscious Processes. Oxford University Press. pp. 87-103.
Comparing Biological Motion in Two Distinct Human Societies.Pierre Pica, Stuart Jackson, Randolph Blake & Nikolaus Troje - 2011 - PLoS ONE 6 (12):e28391.
Motion Percepts: “Sense Specific,” “Kinematic,” or . . . ?A. H. Wertheim - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):338-340.
Evolutionary Internalized Regularities.Robert Schwartz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):626-628.
Added to index2012-06-22
Total downloads13 ( #350,205 of 2,158,463 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #132,912 of 2,158,463 )
How can I increase my downloads?