- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception
Philosophy 54 (207):136-137 (1979)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Molyneux's question: vision, touch, and the philosophy of perception.Michael J. Morgan - 1977 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Reid on Molyneux's question.Robert Hopkins - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):340-364.
Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception.George Pitcher & Michael J. Morgan - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (2):304.
Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception By Michael J. Morgan Cambridge University Press, 1977, vii + 213 pp., £7.50. [REVIEW]R. S. Woolhouse - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (207):136-137.
Michael J. Morgan, "Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch, and the Philosophy of Perception". [REVIEW]Sara Shute - 1981 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (2):255.
Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception By Michael J. Morgan Cambridge University Press, 1977, vii + 213 pp., £7.50. [REVIEW]R. S. Woolhouse - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (207):136-.
MORGAN, M. J., "Molyneux's Question - Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception". [REVIEW]C. A. J. Coady - 1981 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59:118.
Molyneux's question: Vision, touch, and the philosophy of perception. [REVIEW]Sara Shute - 1981 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (2):255-257.
Molyneux's Questions.Peter Baumann - 2004 - In Ralph Schumacher (ed.), Perception and Reality. mentis. pp. 168-187.
Commentary: “Multimodal Theories of Recognition and Their Relation to Molyneux's Question”.John Schwenkler - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Information-processing, phenomenal consciousness and Molyneux's question.John Campbell - 2005 - In José Luis Bermúdez (ed.), Thought, Reference, and Experience: Themes From the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Leibniz on Molyneux's Question.Brian Glenney - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-21
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2017-02-21
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects.Chaz Firestone & Brian J. Scholl - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-72.
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.J. Kevin O’Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience.J. Kevin O’Regan - 2001 - Synthese 129 (1):79-103.
The Spatial Content of Experience.Brad Thompson - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):146-184.
Affordances and Phenomenal Character in Spatial Perception.Simon Prosser - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (4):475-513.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo