Christopher W. Morris & Arthur Ripstein (eds.)
Cambridge University Press (2001)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
What are preferences and are they reasons for action? Is it rational to cooperate with others even if that entails acting against one's preferences? The dominant position in philosophy on the topic of practical rationality is that one acts so as to maximize the satisfaction of one's preferences. This view is most closely associated with the work of David Gauthier, and in this collection of essays some of the most innovative philosophers working in this field explore the controversies surrounding Gauthier's position. Several essays argue against influential conceptions of preference, while others suggest that received conceptions of rational action misidentify the normative significance of rules and practices. This collection will be of particular interest to philosophers of social theory and to reflective social scientists in such fields as economics, political science and psychology.
|
Keywords | Practical reason Preferences (Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2007, 2010, 2011 |
Buy this book | Amazon page |
Call number | BC177.P734 2001 |
ISBN(s) | 9780511570803 0521781841 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options

References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eliciting Reasons: Empirical Methods in Priority Setting.Andreas Hasman - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (1):41-58.
Hobbesianische Theorien des Sozialvertrags.Vuko Andrić - 2019 - Aufklärung Und Kritik 69 (3):93-104.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
55 ( #206,354 of 2,505,763 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,206 of 2,505,763 )
2009-01-28
Total views
55 ( #206,354 of 2,505,763 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,206 of 2,505,763 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads