Esercizi Filosofici 10 (2) (2015)

Authors
Sebastiano Moruzzi
University of Bologna
Abstract
In this paper I argue against John MacFarlane’s radical relativist semantics. By developing an argument of Ross & Schroeder I claim that belief in this relativist theory is incompatible with being a rational agent that acts in accordance with the norms of assertion and retraction. My conclusion is therefore that MacFarlane's semantics is committed to postulating that competent speakers are ignorant of the very theory that provides a – putative – correct account of their linguistic behaviour.
Keywords truth   relativism   assertion   retraction   rationality
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Assessment Sensitivity.Filippo Ferrari - 2016 - Analysis 76 (4):516-527.
Relativism, Vagueness and What is Said.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2008 - In G. Carpintero & M. Koelbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 129.
How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction.Diogo Santos - 2017 - Phenomenology and Mind 12:74-82.
Relative Correctness.Teresa Marques - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):361-373.
Epistemic Modals, Relativism and Assertion.Andy Egan - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):1--22.
Retractions.Teresa Marques - 2018 - Synthese 195 (8):3335-3359.
Truth-Relativism, Norm-Relativism, and Assertion.Patrick Greenough - 2011 - In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Assertoric Force Perspectivalism: Relativism Without Relative Truth.Lionel Shapiro - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1.
Using Truth Relatively.David Sackris - 2016 - Southwest Philosophy Review 32 (1):115-124.
Assertion and Relative Truth.Ramiro Caso - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1309-1325.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-17

Total views
2 ( #1,331,917 of 2,329,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #582,921 of 2,329,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes