Rigidity and Identity across Possible Worlds

Analysis 42 (2):83 - 84 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Two criteria for rigid designation are distinguished; one according to which 'e' is rigid if 'e might not have been e' is false and the other according to which 'e' is rigid if it designates the same thing in all possible worlds in which it designates anything at all. Such criteria are not equivalent since 'x could not but be f' is not entailed by 'nothing other than x could be f'. I illustrate the latter lack of entailment.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On a Broader Notion of Rigidity.Marián Zouhar - 2012 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (26):11-21.
Rigid designation and semantic structure.Arthur Sullivan - 2007 - Philosophers' Imprint 7:1-22.
A semantic account of rigidity.Alan Sidelle - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 80 (1):69 - 105.
General Terms and Non-Trivial Rigid Designation.Genoveva Marti & José Martínez-Fernández - 2007 - In Concha Martínez, José L. Falguera & José M. Sagüillo (eds.), Current topics in logic and analytic philosophy =. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. pp. 103-116.
Rigidity and actuality-dependence.Jussi Haukioja - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):399-410.
Flexible property designators.Dan López De Sa - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):221-230.
De Sousa On Kripke and Theoretical Identities.R. M. Yoshida - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):137-141.
Rigidity, Ontology, and Semantic Structure.Alan Sidelle - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (8):410.


Added to PP

105 (#166,848)

6 months
9 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references