Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):63-76 (2014)

Piero Moraro
Charles Sturt University
Acts of civil disobedience, which imply the open violation of a legal directive, often result in the forceful imposition of a choice upon others (e.g. blockades). This is sometimes justifiable, within a democracy, in cases of ‘democratic deficit’, namely, when fundamental rights of an oppressed minority are at stake. In this article, I claim that the use of physical force, in a democracy, may also be justified by the rights of (at least some of) the very people upon whom force is applied. Focusing on the nature of civil disobedience as a ‘form of address’, I argue: (1) using physical force to address others in the democratic arena does not entail infringing upon their status as autonomous agents; (2) using physical force to address others in the democratic arena may contribute to the fulfilment of a positive duty to promote the autonomy of (at least some of) those very people upon whom force is applied. This is not a defence of paternalism: I claim that using force against others, in the democratic arena, may be constitutive of a behaviour that treats others with the respect due to their status as autonomous agents
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12034
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,343
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Bossnapping Uncivil?Piero Moraro - 2018 - Raisons Politiques 1 (69):29-44.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cyber Disobedience: When is Hacktivism Civil Disobedience?Brian J. Huschle - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):69-83.
Ecosabotage and Civil Disobedience.Michael Martin - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (4):291-310.
Defining Civil Disobedience.Brian Smart - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):249 – 269.
Rawls and Gandhi on Civil Disobedience.Vinit Haksar - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):151 – 192.
Is Ecosabotage Civil Disobedience?Jennifer Welchman - 2001 - Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):97 – 107.
Introduction: Law and Disobedience.Peter Jones - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):319-336.
‘Law and Order’ and Civil Disobedience.Fred R. Berger - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):254 – 273.
Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience.William Smith - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #235,819 of 2,445,340 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,131 of 2,445,340 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes