Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (3):543-559 (2017)

Authors
Jennifer M. Morton
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Practical deliberation consists in thinking about what to do. Such deliberation is deemed rational when it conforms to certain normative requirements. What is often ignored is the role that an agent's context can play in so-called ‘failures’ of rationality. In this paper, I use recent cognitive science research investigating the effects of resource-scarcity on decision-making and cognitive function to argue that context plays an important role in determining which norms should structure an agent's deliberation. This evidence undermines the view that the norms of ‘ideal’ rationality are necessary and universal requirements on deliberation. They are a solution to the problems faced by cognitively limited agents in a context of moderate scarcity. In a context of severe scarcity, the problems faced by cognitively limited agents are different and require deliberation structured by different norms. Agents reason rationally when they use the norms best suited to their context and cognitive capacities.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2016.1236139
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,339
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Sources of Normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Why Be Rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Grit.Sarah Paul & Jennifer Morton - 2018 - Ethics 129 (2):175-203.
The Accuracy-Coherence Tradeoff in Cognition.David Thorstad - forthcoming - British Journal for Philosophy of Science.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Practical Reason.R. Jay Wallace - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why Universal Welfare Rights Are Impossible and What It Means.Danny Frederick - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (4):428-445.
Internalism and Rational Choice.William Albert Wright - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Is Rawlsian Justice Bad for the Environment?Thomas Schramme - 2006 - Analyse & Kritik 28 (2):146-157.
Agency, Scarcity, and Mortality.Luca Ferrero - 2015 - The Journal of Ethics 19 (3-4):349-378.
Deliberative Business Ethics.Ryan Burg - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S4):665 - 683.
The Normativity of Rationality.Benjamin Kiesewetter - 2013 - Dissertation, Humboldt University of Berlin
Fear and Loathing in Deliberation: One Connection Between Emotion and Rationality.Hans Donald Muller - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-04

Total views
116 ( #92,254 of 2,448,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,869 of 2,448,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes