Skepticism about Inductive Knowledge

In Sven Bernecker & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. New York: Routledge (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A survey of arguments and positions concerning the possibility of inductive knowledge, this piece covers: Hume's problem of induction; the underdetermination of theories by evidence; the method of hypothesis; the relationship between underdetermination and evidential holism; attempts to specify how some statements can be said to be evidentially (or justificatorily) relevant to other claims.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,074

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume and the Problem of Induction.James E. Taylor & Stefanie Rocknak - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 174–179.
Conteúdo Empírico de Teorias e Subdeterminação em Willard Quine.Sofia Inês Albornoz Stein - 1998 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 2 (2):205-226.
The presupposition theory of induction.Arthur W. Burks - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (3):177-197.
Underdetermination and the Claims of Science.P. D. Magnus - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
A Twofold Tension in Schurz’s Meta-Inductive Solution to Hume’s Problem of Induction.Tomoji Shogenji - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (3):379-392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-17

Downloads
55 (#399,392)

6 months
6 (#907,516)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joe Morrison
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references