Bioethics 33 (1):185-194 (2019)

Jonathan Beever
The University Of Central Florida
Nicolae Morar
University of Oregon
This paper argues that the practical reach and ethical impact of the One Health paradigm is conditional on satisfactorily distinguishing between interconnected and interdependent factors among human, non-human, and environmental health. Interconnection does not entail interdependence. Offering examples of interconnections and interdependence in the context of existing One Health literature, we demonstrate that the conversations about One Health do not yet sufficiently differentiate between those concepts. They tend to either ignore such distinctions or embrace bioethically untenable positions. We conclude that careful conceptual differentiation can prevent One Health stakeholders either from overreaching or under-reaching the practical and ethical boundaries of this developing paradigm.
Keywords 'One Health'   interconnectedness   interdependence   human microbiome
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12522
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,447
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interdependence, Human Rights and Global Health Law.A. M. Viens - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (4):401-417.
A Human Right to Health? Some Inconclusive Scepticism.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):239-265.
I—The Demands of the Human Right to Health.Jonathan Wolff - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):217-237.


Added to PP index

Total views
15 ( #612,277 of 2,326,341 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #433,912 of 2,326,341 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes